
Turkish newspaper Cumhuriyet faces nebulous accusations in trial
News Hour:
The Cumhuriyet journalists may be looking at very long sentences. With their trial begining on Monday, the defendents could get between seven and a half and 43 years in prison. What exactly they are charged with, however, remains unclear.
According to Anadolu, the state news agency, the charges brought against 17 journalists in their April indictment accuse them of supporting “terrorist organizations.” Two of these groups are named: the movement around the preacher Fethullah Gulen, and the banned Kurdistan Workers’ Party or PKK. Anadolu does not provide details on more concrete accusations, such as the form this support is alleged to have taken.
The case of Ahmet Sik gives some indication of the sort of thing the public prosecutor’s office deems to be such an offense. Sik, an investigative journalist, was arrested at the end of December 2016. The public prosecutor referenced posts on his Twitter account as grounds for the arrest. Anadolu reported that the investigation was based on claims that Sik was “denigrating the Republic of Turkey, its judicial bodies, military and security organization” and “propagandizing for a terrorist organization” in his Twitter postings and in some articles he had published in the Cumhuriyet daily.
What Ahmed Sik did was primarily to ask questions and highlight inconsistencies in government propaganda. For example, in some of his tweets he considered the case of the Russian ambassador to Turkey, Andrei Karlov. Karlov was shot on 19 November, 2016, by a former policemanwith jihadi motives. The government says the gunman was a follower of the Gulen movement. In that case, Sik asked on Twitter, how did they explain the fact that the assassin was a police officer?
Sik also addressed the arrest of the actor, director and politician Sırrı Sureyya Onder, who represented the pro-Kurdish opposition HDP in the Turkish parliament. Together with former deputy prime minister of Turkey, Yalcin Akdogan, Onder published a statement proposing a possible solution for the Kurdish conflict. The member of parliament was then arrested and charged with supporting a terrorist organization. Sik’s conclusion: “If the action which [Peoples’ Democratic Party MP] Sırrı Sureyya Onder is being charged with is a crime, isn’t there supposed to be a bunch of suspects, starting with those sitting in the [Presidential] Palace?”
Sik had already spent a year in prison in 2011 and 2012. Back then, his crime was to criticize the Gulen movement’s influence within the apparatus of state – precisely what Erdogan is doing today. The only difference is that, at that time, Erdogan and Gulen were still the best of friends.
Former Cumhuriyet editor, Can Dündar
Dundar has already been sentenced in an earlier trial to five years and ten months in prison. This sentence has not yet been finalized. Dundar and the paper’s chief correspondent, Erdem Gul, were accused of publishing state secrets.
In May 2015 Cumhuriyet published photos of several trucks being searched as they made their way from Turkey to Syria. Hidden in the vehicles, behind humanitarian relief supplies, was military equipment, presumably for delivery to the Syrian opposition. The Turkish government had previously denied that the convoy was transporting weapons: The photos proved the opposite. “These are the weapons Erdogan claims do not exist,” said the Cumhuriyet headline that accompanied the photos.
‘Fearless journalism’
The trial of Dundar and Gul was criticized heavily around the world. “Surely even the greatest cynic would find it hard not to side with Can Dündar in this trial,” Daniel Heinrich commented for DW. As he said, “Can Dundar and Erdem Gul fulfilled their duty as critical journalists: They shone a spotlight on the questionable role of the Turkish government in the Syria conflict.”
Monday’s trial has already attracted significant criticism even before its start. “The newspaper Cumhuriyet is symbolic of the courageous efforts of the few independent media outlets that remain in Turkey. A conviction would send a disastrous signal and would be a disgrace for the Turkish justice system,” said Christian Mihr, the director of Reporters Without Borders in Germany. Out of 180 countries surveyed for his organization’s annual press freedom ranking, Turkey is currently number 151.