ICJ ruling: Key takeaways from the court decision in Israel genocide case

The International Court of Justice (ICJ) did not demand an immediate ceasefire on Friday, but it did require Israel to take steps to prevent acts of genocide as it fights Hamas militants in the Gaza Strip.

In a lawsuit presented by South Africa, the highest court of the United Nations that handles disputes between states was making a decision.

The decision’s main lessons are outlined below.

The court mandated that Israel guarantee its troops do not commit any acts of genocidal intent in Gaza and abstain from any actions that might be considered violations of the Genocide Convention.

“At least some of the acts and omissions alleged by South Africa to have been committed by Israel in Gaza appear to be capable of falling within the provisions of the (Genocide) Convention,” the judges said.

Israel was ordered by the verdict to protect any evidence pertaining to any claims of genocide in Gaza, as well as to stop and punish any public encouragement to commit genocide against Palestinians.

It stated that Israel must act to enhance the humanitarian conditions for Palestinian residents living in the enclave.

The court did not, however, order an instant truce in Gaza, which Israel claims would give Hamas militants time to reorganize and prepare for further attacks against the nation.

In addition, the court expressed its “deep concern” for the fate of the hostages being held in Gaza and urged Hamas and other armed organizations to free the prisoners promptly and unconditionally.

This article has been posted by a News Hour Correspondent. For queries, please contact through [email protected]
No Comments