Giving blood more frequently – up to every 8 weeks for men and every 12 weeks for women – has no major side effects and could help to increase blood stocks, according to the first-ever randomised trial of blood donation involving more than 45000 people in England published in The Lancet.
In the UK, men can donate every 12 weeks, and women every 16 weeks, but the study showed that reducing the interval between donations by 4 weeks (to every 8 weeks for men, and every 12 weeks for women) had no major impact on the donors’ quality of life, mental function or physical activity, and increased the amount of blood collected over two years by 33% (1.7 units) in men and 24% (0.85 units) in women.
However, some people who gave blood more frequently did report minor symptoms including tiredness and restless legs, and the research suggests this may have been due to giving blood.
The findings may help overcome potential risks to blood stocks, including issues attracting and retaining young donors, and increased demand caused by aging populations. In addition, it could help to increase stocks of much-needed universal blood groups and rare blood groups.
“This study suggests that more frequent blood donation is a feasible and safe option for donors in the UK and gives blood services the short-term option of more frequent collection from donors if the supply falls or demand rises,” says senior author Professor John Danesh, University of Cambridge, UK.
As well as the many thousands of people in the UK needing occasional blood transfusions, this could help people who need regular blood transfusions, such as people with sickle cell disease. Each year, tens of millions of people donate blood worldwide, resulting in 110 million donations which provide life-saving transfusions.
Senior author, Professor Dave Roberts, University of Oxford, UK, says: “In the future, we can use our results to predict which donation intervals suit individual donors and move towards personalized donation intervals.”
Lead author, Dr Emanuele Di Angelantonio, University of Cambridge, UK, says: “The study also showed that donors who weighed above average and those with higher initial stores of iron were able to give more blood.”
Although blood donation services have been in place for more than a century, there has been no randomised trial to evaluate the most suitable interval between donations. This has led to varied blood donation policies globally – with current practice in the UK allowing men to donate every 12 weeks and women every 16 weeks, while men and women can donate every 8 weeks in the USA, and in France and Germany men can donate every 8 weeks and women every 12 weeks.
The study involved 45042 blood donors (22357 men and 22685 women) aged 18 years or over from 25 centers in England. Men were split into three groups to give blood every 12, 10 or 8 weeks, and women gave blood every 16, 14 or 12 weeks. The trial took place over two years.
All participants completed online health questionnaires at the start and end of the trial, and at 6, 12 and 18 months to measure the quality of life, symptoms related to blood donation (such as tiredness, breathlessness, feeling faint, dizziness, and restless legs), physical activity levels and cognitive function. They also gave blood samples at the start and end of the trial to measure hemoglobin and iron levels, and the researchers tracked instances where blood donations were postponed due to hemoglobin levels being too low.
Overall, men and women who gave blood most frequently donated 33% and 24% more blood than people who gave blood least frequently. Over 2 years, men and women in the most frequent donation groups gave 6.9 units and 4.3 units of blood on average each, compared to 5.2 and 3.4 units for men and women in the least frequent donation groups.
There was no difference in serious adverse events, quality of life, cognitive function or levels of physical activity between people who gave blood most and least frequently.
However, people who gave blood more frequently reported more symptoms potentially related to blood donation than those who gave blood less frequently. These symptoms included feeling faint, tired, breathless, and dizzy, and were more commonly experienced by men than women. Men also had palpitations and restless legs more often than women.
More than 30500 people in the study provided blood samples at the beginning and end of the study to help measure their iron and hemoglobin levels.
On average, compared to people who gave blood less frequently, people who gave blood most frequently had lower iron levels and were more likely to be iron deficient by the end of the trial – 24% (598 of 2525) of men who gave blood most frequently, compared to 12% (359 of 2952) of men who gave least frequently, and 27% (655 of 2419) of women who gave blood most frequently, compared to 22% (558 of 2572) of women who gave least frequently.
People giving blood most frequently also had lower hemoglobin levels after two years and were more likely to have hemoglobin levels below the minimum threshold to donate blood (18.0% and 19.4% for men and women giving blood most frequently, compared to 10.3% and 15.6% for men and women giving least frequently). As a result, during the two years of the trial around one in three people giving blood most frequently had their donation postponed at least once due to their haemoglobin levels being too low (33%, 2303 of 7074 men and 31%, 2199 of 6994 women who gave blood most frequently, compared to 12%, 836 of 6958 men and 18%, 1202 of 6774 women who gave least frequently).
However, the researchers found that the reduced levels of hemoglobinn and iron did not fully explain the increased rate of symptoms experienced by those giving blood most frequently, and propose that more research be done to better understand the causes of these symptoms.
The researchers note some limitations within the study, including that delays between measurements of symptoms associated with blood donation (questionnaires provided throughout the trial, asking about symptoms over the past six months) and haemoglobin and iron levels (measured at the end of the two year study) may explain why the association between iron deficiency and symptoms is weaker than expected.
